Name two Enlightenment philosophes who critiqued absolute monarchy and promoted constitutional limits on power.

Prepare for the Enlightenment and Revolutions Test. Engage with flashcards and multiple choice questions, each offering insightful hints and explanations to help you excel. Get ready for success!

Multiple Choice

Name two Enlightenment philosophes who critiqued absolute monarchy and promoted constitutional limits on power.

Explanation:
Enlightenment thinkers challenged absolute monarchy by arguing that power should be limited and regulated by law and by structured institutions. Montesquieu contributes the strong case for constitutional limits through the separation of powers—dividing government into legislative, executive, and judicial branches so no single body can dominate. This separation creates checks and balances that protect liberty and prevent tyranny. Voltaire adds the crucial dimension of civil liberties and critique of arbitrary rule, advocating for freedom of expression, religious toleration, and governance guided by reason and law. His stance supports the idea that rulers must operate within constitutional constraints rather than wield unchecked authority. Together, they embody the movement toward constitutional limits on power, which is why this pairing is the best fit. Other options pair thinkers whose ideas either favored strong centralized authority or focused on different political questions, not the clear combination of institutional checks and reinforced rights that Montesquieu and Voltaire provide.

Enlightenment thinkers challenged absolute monarchy by arguing that power should be limited and regulated by law and by structured institutions. Montesquieu contributes the strong case for constitutional limits through the separation of powers—dividing government into legislative, executive, and judicial branches so no single body can dominate. This separation creates checks and balances that protect liberty and prevent tyranny. Voltaire adds the crucial dimension of civil liberties and critique of arbitrary rule, advocating for freedom of expression, religious toleration, and governance guided by reason and law. His stance supports the idea that rulers must operate within constitutional constraints rather than wield unchecked authority. Together, they embody the movement toward constitutional limits on power, which is why this pairing is the best fit.

Other options pair thinkers whose ideas either favored strong centralized authority or focused on different political questions, not the clear combination of institutional checks and reinforced rights that Montesquieu and Voltaire provide.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Passetra

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy